Films You Didn't Know Were Part Of A Trilogy

John Carpenter's Apocalypse Trilogy is a season's worth of nightmares brought to terrifying life as three unique and unforgettable horror films. The Thing tells the story of an ill-fated research mission to Antarctica that finds an alien organism that can become anyone, and may have already become them without them realizing it. Prince of Darkness is a movie in which the Antichrist is a glowing green liquid in a church basement, the devil is a hand in a mirror, and Alice Cooper is the scariest homeless man you've ever seen. In the Mouth of Madness is perhaps the best cinematic adaptation of the horror of H.P. Lovecraft, even though it's not directly based on anything Lovecraft actually wrote.

Although they tell completely separate stories, the three films are connected thematically and meant to be considered together. As supernatural horror movies go, they ask more questions about the problem of evil than they answer. What does pure evil look like? Can it be killed? Will we recognize it when it's staring us in the face? What if we're simply not good enough or not strong enough to resist its many temptations? What madness awaits the souls of those who resist evil? And indeed, what if we've already given in without even realizing it?

We won't ruin the twists if you haven't seen the movies yet. If you're a Lovecraft fan — or a fan of well-done, claustrophobic horror in general — these are the films for you.

Trilogy? We love The Addams Family. We love The Addams Family Values even more. Christopher Lloyd stole the show as a lovestruck Uncle Fester. His unlikely romance with Debbie (Joan Cusack) flung the radio of love into the hotel bathtub of our hearts. Positivity-obsessed camp counselors (Peter MacNicol and Christine Baranski) made the Addams' morbid affectations all the more appealing.

So, what's the third one? How haven't we heard about this sooner? 1998's The Addams Family Reunion is that rarest of peculiarities: a bad movie with Tim Curry in it. Good as they are as Gomez and Morticia in The Addams Family Reunion, Tim Curry and Daryl Hannah cannot compete with Raul Julia and Anjelica Huston. The other replacements fare worse.

Another ABC Family-funded abomination, The Addams Family Reunion deserves to be forgotten. Even the original cast would have struggled to make the plot about Waltzheimer's disease interesting. It's turning the Addamses normal! What a lark!

Friends don't let friends watch the Dungeons and Dragons film trilogy. Whereas a lot of the entries on this list start with one good movie that leads to two bad sequels, Dungeons and Dragons was bad from moment one. The main problem with a Dungeon and Dragons movie, to begin with, is that the source material is a tabletop roleplaying game. That means it's all about the setting, the character archetypes, and the rules of how things work, with no ingrained story of its own. Gary Gygax's game depends entirely upon players' input — and the narrative skills of the Dungeon Masters who run the game — for its continuing appeal. You can't just slap the D&D brand on a generic knights-and-dragons fantasy film and lure fantasy nerds out of their garages and into the theaters.

In fact, Dungeons and Dragons has all the hallmarks of a garbage 1980s fantasy script that was dusted off and re-branded with minimal edits. Marlon Wayans plays the painfully stereotypical (and just generally painful) character Snails, with Jeremy Irons adding some dramatic heft to the cast (but it's far too late to save it).

And if you think Dungeons and Dragons is a mess, the two direct-to-streaming sequels, 2005's Dungeons & Dragons: Wrath of the Dragon God and 2012's

Dungeons & Dragons: The Book of Vile Darkness, certainly aren't any better. If you want to experience Dungeons & Dragons, you're going to have to get some friends together and actually play D&D. The movies will not help you; they bring only pain.

Unlike its empty-headed peers, Legally Blonde rose above a tired premise: "Dumb sorority girl becomes a shrewd lawyer to impress — and intentionally marry — the normal-nosed Wilson brother? What will your team of irreverent geniuses dream up next, MGM?" With a smart enough third act, the movie defied our jaded expectations and undid most of the destruction caused by the truly clueless TV adaptation of Clueless.

Then came the sequels. Unlike some sequels on this list, Legally Blonde 2: Red, White & Blonde retained its principal star — and that's all. Everything from the Capitol Hill setting to Witherspoon's tone-deaf getup — what was that pink pillbox hat about? — failed to impress fans and critics. Without Witherspoon, "Miss Woods Goes to Washington" would be unwatchable. (Can you tell where this is going?)

The straight-to-DVD ABC Family movie Legally Blondes rehashes the same tired blonde jokes in a prep-school setting. With neither Witherspoon's charisma nor a halfway entertaining concept to distract us from its cash-grabby one-dimensionality, this movie ought to qualify as an act of psychic war. We're surprised the filmmakers haven't been sued for damages. An "official" third installment, provisionally titled Legally Blonde 3, will seek to erase Blondes from existence when it arrives in theaters in 2022.

Proving his cinematic genius yet again, Sam Raimi's Darkman takes a stupid premise and makes it pulpy and palatable. An ultra-violent antihero, Darkman's protagonist starts to die vampire-style if he gets too much sun. Darkman might have spawned the cult of Liam Neeson if Neeson's face hadn't been obscured by bandages and makeup effects for almost the entire movie.

Unfortunately, the abominable sequels mistake Darkman's stupidity for its strength. A trilogy in the technical sense only, the Darkman series follows the established tradition of an inverse relationship between quality and sequel number. The casting decisions give the game away. In Darkman II: The Return of Durant, Arnold "The Mummy to Brendan Fraser" Vosloo stepped in for Neeson. We can forgive the studio's decision to sub in mute Mr. Clean the scarab romancer for the swashbuckling, wolf-fighting, England-resisting, Batman-antagonizing, thricely Taken with revenge Liam Neeson. At least the bad guy is Robert G. Durant, played once again by Larry Drake.

In Darkman III: Die Darkman Die, Jeff Fahey provides the villainy. Akin to the Tim Burton-produced, Joel Schumacher-directed Batman sequels, the Darkman series' later entries neutered the movies by putting the original movie's director in the role of executive producer and hiring a competent, though bland, director to take his place. Originally, Part III was going to be Part II and vice versa. That's the extent of the sequels' superfluity in the franchise; the chronology makes no difference. Unless you have a thing for low-budget sequels, you can skip from Darkman to the 2012 fan-made film.

Directed by Park Chan-wook, Oldboy won the Grand Prix at Cannes, introduced a whole lot of people to Korean cinema, and left audiences absolutely speechless with its pervy third act. It's also the gold standard for hallway fights, and it featured an octopus-eating scene that will never — and should never — be topped. Sadly, the movie inspired an inferior sequel that just couldn't compare to the epic Greek tragedy of the original film, but if you want to further explore the twisted mind of Park Chan-wook, then you're in luck, because Oldboy is actually the second installment in the director's bloodsoaked "vengeance trilogy."

This thematic series got started in 2002 with Sympathy for Mr. Vengeance, the story of a man seeking revenge for the death of his daughter. However, the case isn't that cut and dry since her accidental murderer was part of a kidnapping scheme that was meant to save his sister's life. In 2003, we got Oldboy, the story of a man mysteriously imprisoned for 15 years, and when he's released one day, he decides it's hammer time. Park finished his trilogy with Lady Vengeance, the story of a woman who takes the fall for a crime she didn't commit, and when she's released from prison, she decides to hunt down the man responsible.

The trilogy of movies revolve around the concept of vengeance, especially the idea that getting even never actually solves one's problems. Revenge is messy, bloody, and morally murky. People are tortured, bad guys are murdered, but by the end of these movies, the "heroes" are never better off. In fact, they've often become the very monsters they sought to destroy. While each film explores these ideas in slightly different ways, the vengeance trilogy is a must-watch series for fans of Korean movies, gore-soaked cinema, and stories that aspire to the bloody heights of Shakespeare.

Directed by Patrick Brice, Creep finds Mark Duplass going from mumblecore to murder, playing an uncomfortably eerie dude who hires a videographer (Brice) to help him make a movie for his unborn son. As the day stretches on, Brice starts suspecting this weirdo might have something more on his mind than filming a farewell video. With Duplass wearing a wolf mask, Creep is a disturbingly effective found footage film that breathed new life into a tired old genre, but while it scored high marks on Rotten Tomatoes, it didn't exactly feel like a movie that would produce a sequel.

Fortunately, the gods of horror cinema smiled upon us and gave us Creep 2, which just so happens to be one of the greatest horror sequels of all time. While it's done in the same found-footage style as the original, the sequel goes in a completely different direction. This time around (spoilers), we know from the very beginning that Duplass is a serial killer, but he's also losing his lust for life — and for taking lives. That all changes when he meets a YouTuber (Desiree Akhavan) hoping to make an incredibly creepy vlog, and as the killer grows closer to his new collaborator, he begins to rediscover his old passion.

In addition to being a horror film, Creep 2 is a blackhearted meta-comedy that examines both the found footage genre and the very idea of filmmaking. And as Kevin Lincoln of Vulture writes, the movie also poses some interesting questions about "why we're interested in serial killers in the first place." But after the hilariously scary Creep 2, where will the franchise go next? Well, at the Telluride Horror Show, director Patrick Brice confirmed there will be a third film, and on the Phantom Podcast Network, he explained part three will be a whole lot weirder than the first two movies. Comparing Creep 2 to Evil Dead 2, Brice promised the third movie will be "our Army of Darkness... going kind of off the rails."

Certain movies — especially prestigious war movies — don't seem like they should be part of a trilogy. Nobody would make Platoon Part Three or a sequel to Saving Private Ryan. And you probably wouldn't expect a franchise to pop up around Jarhead, the 2005 film set during Desert Storm. Directed by Sam Mendes, the original film boasts a pretty incredible cast, featuring some serious actors like Jake Gyllenhaal, Jamie Foxx, and Chris Cooper. Jarhead is based on a true story and follows a group of frustrated, bored soldiers burning away in the desert sun. As Roger Ebert put it, Jarhead "contains no heroism, little action, no easy laughs," but despite its anti-war message, this movie somehow inspired a super gung-ho action franchise full of bad writing, badass soldiers, and bloody gun battles.

In other words, parts two and three are the complete opposite of the original.

Jarhead 2: Field of Fire was a direct-to-video sequel released by Universal Home Entertainment in 2014, and it features more shootouts than the first film has characters. Starring some recognizable names like Cole Hauser, Bokeem Woodbine, and Stephen Lang, the sequel follows a completely different group of Marines protecting an Afghani woman who's basically Malala Yousafzai. The Taliban wants her dead, and our heroes fire a whole lot of bullets getting the girl to safety. 

As for Jarhead 3: The Siege, all we can say is "The horror! The horror!" Yeah, it's pretty awful. Once again featuring totally different characters, this direct-to-video B-movie borrows its premise from the 2012 Benghazi attack, and it's pretty much a straight-up pro-war flick, complete with racist one-liners. In other words, the Jarhead series has strayed far afield from the original entry, but evidently, somebody's watching these movies, so part four might invade your TV screen sometime soon.

Duncan Jones, the man behind Source Code and Warcraft, spent 15 years working on his passion project, a sci-fi noir called Mute. Despite a myriad of personal and professional problems that slowed him down, Jones soldiered on and finally finished his own futuristic version of Casablanca. A Netflix film, Mute follows a silent bartender (Alexander Skarsgard) who's searching for his missing girlfriend (Seyneb Saleh), but as he digs deeper into the mystery, he keeps running across two shady surgeons (Paul Rudd and Justin Theroux) on his quest to find his lady fair.

Based on the trailer, you'd never guess this was the second installment of a trilogy, but according to Jones, Mute takes place in the same universe as Moon, his critically acclaimed space drama that stars Sam Rockwell as a lonely astronaut who discovers a shocking secret on his isolated moon base. Jones calls his cinematic world "the Moon-iverse," and he promised that a third film would eventually come along to complete his science fiction trilogy. After teasing that the next chapter would "have a female lead" and would focus on two sisters, Jones eventually crowdfunded the project as a graphic novel titled Madi: Once Upon a Time in the Future, which was published in late 2020.

Thanks to Guillermo del Toro's love for creepy creatures, we've been gifted with some truly incredible films like Pan's Labyrinth and The Shape of Water. But before del Toro was known for being a maestro of monsters, he struggled with a little creature feature called Mimic. The man had a creative vision, but the studio wanted something different, and the resulting film is not one of del Toro's best. Nevertheless, the movie has its moments, and it's got a pretty cool premise involving giant cockroaches that fool their human victims by impersonating people.

While the movie was not a box office success, evidently it had that certain something, because somebody at Dimension Films thought it had franchise potential. Mimic 2 was released direct to DVD in 2001, and it played like an ickier version of Beauty and the Beast. The sequel followed an entomologist from the first film (Alix Koromzay) who's being stalked by a jealous, humanoid insect that wants her for, well, uh, romantic purposes.

Interestingly, the third film — Mimic 3: Sentinel, released straight to video in 2003 — borrows the plot from Rear Window by having its voyeuristic hero trapped inside an apartment, watching the world through his camera. However, his spying soon turns into sleuthing when he slowly realizes there's something strange happening across the street... something that might involve some very hungry bugs. This trilogy capper did surprisingly well with the few critics who saw it. After all, who doesn't want to watch an Alfred Hitchcock movie involving killer cockroaches?

In 2017, Call Me By Your Name was a huge success as independent movies go, gaining much critical acclaim and four Oscar nominations (it won Best Adapted Screenplay). The gay love story starred Armie Hammer and Timothée Chalamet in a whirlwind summertime romance with an age difference that made some viewers uncomfortable — Hammer's character was 24 but looked older, while Chalamet's character was 17 but seemed younger. Despite all the discussions that went on in public and in private about Call Me By Your Name, however, few American viewers realized it was actually the third installment in a trilogy.

Italian director Luca Guadagnino is deeply interested in the desire that human beings feel for one another, and he spent the better part of a decade making a trilogy of narratively unrelated films on that theme. The first was I Am Love in 2009, which starred Tilda Swinton as the wife of a wealthy industrialist who has a passionate affair with a chef. Then in 2015 came A Bigger Splash, which also starred Swinton, this time as a rock star torn between past and present lovers, even as her current boyfriend is tempted by a younger woman.

Call Me By Your Name is the only film in Guardagnino's Desire Trilogy not to feature Swinton, but it shares thematic elements and picturesque Italian settings with those first two installments.

The 2010 sci-fi action film Skyline is less like a piece of cinema and more like a wild, over-the-top thrill ride. It stars Eric Balfour and Scottie Thompson as Jarrod and Elaine, a married couple with a baby on the way, who are attending a friend's birthday party when aliens suddenly invade Los Angeles. The mysterious aliens use their technology to mesmerize the populace and then scoop the people up into their ships. The film has a truly strange ending, which we will now spoil for those who are curious but not curious enough to watch it: Jarrod and Elaine are captured and taken aboard an alien ship, where Jarrod's brain is quickly extracted from his body and put into a biomechanical alien body. For some reason Jarrod's brain glows red instead of blue like the other alien drones, which means he retains his memories and personality. The movie ends with alien Jarrod protecting his still-human wife and unborn child from the other aliens.

Things get even weirder in Beyond Skyline, a sequel in which Elaine's pregnancy is accelerated and so is the growth of the daughter she births. Along the way, a resistance against the aliens begins to come together, including other alien drones who manage to maintain their inner humanity as Jarrod did. The third movie in the trilogy, Skylines, gets weirder still as humanity and their half-human allies finally manage to defeat the aliens ten years later, under the leadership of Rose, Jarrod and Elaine's grown adult 10-year-old daughter. Liam O'Donnell directed all three movies, so there does seem to be an artistic vision at work, no matter how little sense it seems to make.

The Beastmaster, directed by Don Coscarelli, is one of the better sword and sorcery movies of the early 1980s. It stars Marc Singer as a barely dressed hero named Dar who talks to animals — specifically a golden eagle, two ferrets, and a panther, who all accompany him on his adventures. He does battle with an evil wizard, as all sword and sorcery heroes must, and even discovers he was born a prince, although he has no interest in being king.

The Beastmaster told a complete story that seemed to require no sequels, and for nine years it had none. During that time, it gained many fans thanks to playing constantly on cable television, and in 1991 a sequel finally came. Beastmaster 2: Through the Portal of Time features Dar and his animal friends following two new villains through the titular portal to early '90s Los Angeles, where they have plenty of fish-out-of-water jokes to go along with the sword-swinging action.

A third movie, Beastmaster III: The Eye of Braxus, aired on television in 1996. It featured genre favorite Tony Todd as an ally of Dar's, who helps him rescue his younger brother from the forces of evil. Sadly, the third movie is neither as good as the first nor as all-out ridiculous as the second. It's just a bit generic, and Marc Singer is starting to look a bit old for the role. If you've never seen a Beastmaster, definitely watch the first. Watch the second if you have time to kill, but you can safely steer clear of the third.